Re: MRP Combo
Eric,I don't know what 'Real' safety stock means. Do you have ....'Unreal' safety stock as well? You mention '......10 should get confirm....'. Are you talking about Availability checking (ATP)? ATP...
View ArticleRe: Production Order numbers are not generated in sequence
Hi, If system holds few no's, using few no's and discarding unused no's will not hinder the sequence, there will be gaps. But here system is holding few no's and not using it. Using these no's some...
View ArticleRe: MRP Combo
Hi DB49, Let me explain you my scenario one more time. Total stock = 20 EA Reorder point = 15 EA. That means if stock falls below 15 then it should trigger replenished. So to cover this scenario we...
View ArticleRe: Production Order numbers are not generated in sequence
Sapna,You seem to be very concerned with production order numbering sequence. As mentioned in the KBA I mentioned earlier, production order numbering is not designed to be strictly sequential. It is,...
View ArticleRe: Production Order numbers are not generated in sequence
The terminations could be causing the gaps in number range. You could check the express docs (or ST22/SM13) for the order numbers stated and see if they are the one missing from you sequences -- I...
View ArticleRe: MRP Combo
Eric,I will agree that MPR type V1 / VM will not trigger replenishments based on safety stock. However, ATP is not MRP. MRP type does not directly control ATP confirmations. What is the requirements...
View Articlesub component showing in MD04, deleted in PO
Hello experts, We have a repair process whereby we replace the item with a non-valuated item. MD04 plans the non-valuated item. We have a situation where the item was deleted on the PO, yet it...
View ArticleRe: Planned issue
Hi Mohit my requirements are also same so if you got the answer please share that Regards, Zubair Baig
View ArticleClik here to view.
Re: Production Order numbers are not generated in sequence
Hello Sapna It is not abnormal. Skipping of numbers in Production client happens for a reason. This is due to the Buffer setting of 20 for Order object AUFTRAG in SNRO. The reason for this setting is...
View ArticleRe: Process order for Sales return stock
Hello Milton, Thank you for a quick response.I have gone through the building blocks given by you, it shows a base line step which i already tried. Some of the blogs says use CORO for creating rework...
View ArticleNo BOM Selected through MD51
BOM Explosion OK But No BOM Selected (Msg 52 ) During MRP Run Thorugh MD51.
View ArticleGeneration of CO1P records and CORUPROC
Dear Experts, I have read a few notes regarding CORUPROC and CO1P but still have some questions as follows: 1. For an instance, I need to intentionally create CO1P records for testing. Is this...
View ArticleChanging batch determination in Process order
Hi All Iam using batch selection criteria for order type and plant. I want to display batches in batch determination that meet the selection criteria. when batch determination is called then initially...
View ArticleRe: Change component allocation in CEWB for multiple routes
Dear Thomas, for allocation component in massive way you have the following possibility:1. Create a LSMW with recording BI of CA02 (allocation component activity). 2. Use the following fm...
View ArticleProduction order scheduling multilevel
Dear all,i have the following requirment: Production order MTO 1 PF Production order MTO SG Production order MTO SG I know very well that in the standard system is not possible to...
View ArticleRe: No BOM Selected through MD51
Dear P puri have you already try to create a new production order (or planned order manually) CO08 or md11?Normally during creation order the system create more details of the reading and automatic...
View ArticleRe: No BOM Selected through MD51
Hello Check the following document:Problems with BOM explosion on MRP (Exception message 52) BRCaetano
View ArticleRe: Generation of CO1P records and CORUPROC
Hi Thomas It is possible to intentionally generate records in CO1P.You must defined on the customizing transaction OPKC that the movements will be posted later in background job and then refer the OPKC...
View ArticleRe: sub component showing in MD04, deleted in PO
Hello On the following WIKI you will find instructions to clear this inconsistency: Inconsistencies for planning elements and display problems on transaction MD04 - ERP Manufacturing (PP) - SCN Wiki...
View ArticleRe: MRP Combo
Hello You can try to explore the "shared safety stock" functionality. See the information on the following KBA: https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1704074 This KBA provides the following...
View Article